Explorations

Future Paths of Phenomenology

1st OPHEN Summer Meeting

Repository | Series | Book | Chapter

205960

Self-knowledge, freedom, and irony

the language of nature in Goethe

pp. 351-371

Abstract

Every science presupposes decisions concerning what one would like to know; that is, what is to be learned from the scientific inquiry. In the modern science of nature, for example, it is considered worth knowing how phenomena can be produced and reproduced. The ideal of knowledge — the guiding conception of the scientific truth to be sought — is thus at the very outset that a state of affairs is understood when we can produce it; in other words, it is the acquisition of power in nature. The value judgement concerning what is worth knowing, then, precedes scientific work, lies in its background, and shows up in the objects of science only in the type of interest we take in them, which is common to them all. In particular, the pre-existing concern with domination, in the light of which all objects of natural science are seen, is itself not a theme of the prevailing science of nature. It is only in this sense that science is valuefree, or rather, value-blind.

Publication details

Published in:

Amrine Frederick, Zucker Francis J., Wheeler Harvey (1987) Goethe and the sciences: a reappraisal. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 351-371

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-3761-1_18

Full citation:

(1987) „Self-knowledge, freedom, and irony: the language of nature in Goethe“, In: F. Amrine, F. J. Zucker & H. Wheeler (eds.), Goethe and the sciences, Dordrecht, Springer, 351–371.